Public Corporations/Public Development Authorities (PDA)
(RCW 35.21.730 - 35.21.755)
Contents
- About PDAs
- Articles
- List of Known Operating Public Corporations and Public Development Authorities
- Sample Local Government Ordinance Provisions, Charters and Bylaws
- Frequently Asked Questions
About PDAs
Under RCW 35.21.730, et seq., general purpose local government may establish "public corporations, commissions or authorities." These special purpose quasi-municipal corporations have become known as "PDA's." The statutory purpose for the creation of a public corporation under this statute is to improve the administration of authorized federal grants or programs, to improve governmental efficiency and services, or to improve the general living conditions in the urban areas of the state. The provision was initially enacted to authorize counties, cities, and towns to participate in and implement federally-assisted programs, including revenue sharing.
Many communities have established public corporations for a variety of public purposes. In the opinion of many municipal attorneys, a public corporation created under RCW 35.21.730, et seq. is best used for unusual endeavors, which for a variety of reasons, the parent municipality would not want to undertake itself.
Articles
- Public Development Authorities (
193 KB), by Jay Reich, Stacey Crawshaw Lewis, and Deanna Gregory, Preston Gates and Ellis LLP from MRSC Budget Suggestions, Information Bulletin No. 416, August 2004
- City and County Options for Creative Financing: PFDs, PDAs and 501(c)(3)s : Alternative Financing Mechanisms (
1.09 MB), by Jay Reich and Stacey Crawshaw-Lewis, Attorneys, Preston Gates & Ellis, Washington Economic Development Association's Spring Conference in Pasco on April 15-16, 2003.
- Tacoma News Tribune Series on SafeHarbor (Grays Harbor PDA) - Suggested reading for officials at any city or county considering the formation of a PDA: a cautionary tale
- Efficient and Effective Uses of Public Corporations/PDA's (
162 KB), by B. Gerald Johnson, Attorney, Preston Thorgrimson Shidler Gates & Ellis. Information Bulletin No. 473 (1992), Legal Notes, Proceedings of June 20-21, 1991, pp. 191-197.
- Public Corporations Created under Ch. 37, Laws of 1974, 1st Ex. Sess. (
176 KB), by Robert F. Hauth, Assistant Attorney General, State of Washington. Information Bulletin No. 356 (1974), Legal Notes. pp. 87-90.
- Public Development Authorities: Are We Getting Our Money's Worth? Municipal League Foundation Issue Watch, August 1991. (G 10.0000) MRSC Library Loan.
- Public Development Authorities in Seattle (
217 KB), by Donald H. Stout, General Counsel, City of Seattle Law Department. Information Bulletin No. 473 (1992), Legal Notes, Proceedings of June 20-21, 1991, pp. 198-214.
- Public Development Authorities in Seattle (
835 KB) League of Woman Voters of Seattle. May 1989.
List of Known Operating Public Corporations or Public Development Authorities
Samples of Local Government Ordinance Provisions, Charters, Bylaws
This list is a sampling Washington local governments that have enacted provisions allowing the formation of public corporations. In some instances, provisions were enacted providing for public corporations, but no actual public corporation was created by these jurisdictions, or the corporation created is no longer active.
Cities and Joint City-County
- Almira, Creston, Wilbur Regional Public Development Authority Agreement (
351 KB) - Includes Interlocal Agreement Ordinance, Charter, and Bylaws, 6-01
- Agreement between Lincoln County and Wilbur, Almira and Creston (
29 KB) to allow NW Lincoln County Regional Development Authority to operate outside the limits of the incorporated cities and towns, 2000.
- Bellevue Meydenbauer Center and Bellevue Convention Center Authority
- Bellevue Ordinance No. 4092 (
1.21 MB) Creating the authority and adopting the bylaws
- Bellevue Ordinance No. 4708 (
69 KB) Amendment to Charter
- Bellevue Ordinance No. 4092 (
- Bellingham Municipal Code Ch. 6.64 - Public Authorities
- Carnation Municipal Code Ch. 19.04 - Public Corporations
- Everett Municipal Code Ch. 2.104 - Public Corporations
- Federal Way, Kent, Renton, Tukwila - Valley Communications Center Development Authority
- Federal Way Ordinance No. 00-369 (
302 KB) Approving the Formation of the Valley Communications Center Development Authority, 4-00
- Exhibit A (
1.19 MB) - Kent Ordinance No. -- Approving Charter and Bylaws
- Exhibit B (
572 KB) - Charter of the Valley Communications Center Development Authority
- Valley Communications Center
- Federal Way Ordinance No. 00-369 (
- Kent Ordinance No. 3396, (
461 KB) Kent Downtown Market Development Authority, 1998. (Authority has completed work and is in the process of being dissolved 6-03)
- Hurricane Ridge Public Development Authority
- Port Angeles Ordinance No. 3061 (
972 KB) Creates the Hurricane Ridge Public Development Authority, 8-00
- Charter of Hurricane Ridge Public Development Authority (
1.86 MB)
- Hurricane Ridge Ski and Snowboard Area
- Port Angeles Ordinance No. 3061 (
- Odessa Ordinance No. 546 and Charter, Odessa Public Development Authority (
517 KB), passed 1-00.
- Republic Ordinance No. 2003-07 (
140 KB) creates the Republic Public Development Authority, includes Bylaws, 4-03
- Seattle Municipal Code Ch 3.110 - Public Corporations
- Seattle Public Development Authorities
- Seattle City Council Public Development Authority PDA Guidelines
- Spokane Municipal Code Ch. 4.25 Public Development Authority
- Tacoma Municipal Code Ch. 1.60 (
1.56 MB) - Public Development Corporations
- Vancouver
- Vancouver Municipal Code Ch. 2.73 - Downtown Redevelopment Authority (DRA)
- Vancouver Ordinance No. M-3738 - Approves changes to the Charter of the Downtown Redevelopment Authority (Vancouver Hotel and Convention Center Project), 2-06 - MRSC Library Loan
- Vancouver Ordinance No. M-3739 - Creates the City Center Development Authority, grants charter, and approves bylaws (Vancouver City Center Vision Project), 2-06 - MRSC Library Loan
- Union Gap Municipal Code Ch. 2.110 - Development Corporations
Counties
- Chelan County Resolution No. 2000-106 (
1.98 MB) - Mission Ridge Public Development Authority, 9-00
- Chelan County Resolution No. 200-106, Exhibit A (
1.15 MB) - Charter of Mission Ridge Public Development Authority
- Chelan County Resolution No. 200-106, Exhibit A (
- Grays Harbor Public Development Authority (Satsop Development Park)
- Tacoma News Tribune Series on SafeHarbor (Grays Harbor PDA) - Suggested reading for officials at any city or county considering the formation of a PDA: a cautionary tale.
- PDA Clears Second Audit, Daily World, July 17, 2002
- Washington State Auditor's Office Accountability Audit Report (
124 KB), Grays Harbor Public Development Authority Audit Period January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001, Issued July 16, 2002
- Washington State Auditor's Office Accountability Audit Report (
260 KB), Grays Harbor Public Development Authority, January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2000, issued Mary 14, 2002
- Lewis County Code, Ch. 2.30 (
301 KB) - East Lewis County Public Development Authority
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is a public development corporation (PDA) established under RCW 35.21.730 - .755 a municipal corporation?
MRSC legal consultants do not consider a PDA to be a municipal corporation, although there is no specific authority on this issue. The authorizing statutes, RCW 35.21.730 - .755 refer to a PDA as a "public corporation," and do not refer to one as a municipal or quasi-municipal corporation. A PDA is set up under the statutes as essentially a sub-agency of a city, town, or county, with no defined territory. This opinion is also based on various definitions scattered throughout the RCWs that appear to distinguish between public corporations and municipal or quasi-municipal corporations. See, e.g., RCW 7.25.010; 43.21F.025; 43.21G.020; 39.59.010. While these definitions do not specifically apply to the PDA statutes, they provide some consistent evidence of the statutory distinction between a municipal corporation and a public corporation that may be created by the former. In addition, a PDA does not have the attributes of a municipal corporation as discussed in McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, §§ 2.07.10, .20.
However, even if a PDA is not considered a municipal corporation, it is nevertheless subject to the gift of public funds and lending of credit prohibitions in article 8, section 7 of the state constitution that apply to municipal corporations. RCW 35.21.757. A PDA is also subject to other general laws that apply to local governments, such as the public disclosure law, the Open Public Meetings Act, municipal accounting requirements in chapter 43.09 RCW, the contractual conflict of interest prohibitions and the ethics provisions in chapter 42.23 RCW, and the prohibition on using its facilities for campaign purposes. RCW 35.21.759.
- Do bid and prevailing wage laws apply to public development authorities (PDAs) established under RCW 35.21.730?
Although there is no statute that specifically addresses the application of bid laws to PDAs, it makes logical sense that bid laws should apply to PDAs in their capacity as creations of municipalities, to which bid laws specifically apply. The prevailing wage laws specifically apply to "the state or any county, municipality or political subdivision created by its laws." RCW 39.12.020. A PDA is a form of political subdivision authorized by state law. Accordingly, the prevailing wage law applies. Also, it is likely that bidding and prevailing wage laws would apply by virtue of RCW 35.21.759, discussed in the preceding question.
- Is a city liable for debts incurred by a public corporation?
The legislative intent of RCW 35.21.730(4) appears to be that a city, town or county would not be liable for any debts incurred by a public corporation. Any liabilities incurred are to be satisfied exclusively from the assets and properties of the public corporation. See also RCW 35.21.750.

